ArXiv Bans Researchers for AI 'Slop' in Submissions

The open-access scientific repository arXiv announced a new policy to ban authors for one year if they submit research papers containing unvetted AI usage ^[1]. This enforcement targets what editors call AI "slop," such as hallucinated references or leftover chatbot prompts found within the text ^[2]. The move aims to curb the rising volume of low-quality, machine-generated content in the global scientific record ^[3].

Under the new rules, the ban applies when editors find incontrovertible evidence that AI tools were used without proper human oversight ^[1]. While arXiv allows AI assistance for polishing text, submitting unverified or false information is considered a breach of academic integrity ^[2]. This measure is intended to protect the reliability of the platform as it faces an influx of automated submissions ^[3].