Protecting Scientific Integrity Standards

arXiv Bans AI-Generated 'Slop' for One Year

Researchers face suspensions for submitting papers with fake citations or chatbot artifacts to the preprint server.

By Avantgarde News Desk··1 min read
An editorial illustration showing a research paper on a digital screen being marked with a red suspension stamp.

An editorial illustration showing a research paper on a digital screen being marked with a red suspension stamp.

Photo: Avantgarde News

The preprint repository arXiv introduced a new policy to combat the rise of unchecked AI-generated content [1]. Authors who submit papers containing obvious signs of 'slop,' such as fabricated references or residual chatbot instructions, now face a one-year suspension [2]. This move aims to protect the integrity of the open-access scientific archive [3].

The policy specifically targets papers that display a lack of human oversight, including those with hallucinated citations [1]. arXiv staff noted that while AI tools can assist writing, the final output must be verified by researchers [2]. These new rules respond to a growing volume of low-quality submissions that clog the research pipeline [3].

Editorial notes

Transparency note

AI assisted drafting. Human edited and reviewed.

AI assisted
Yes
Human review
Yes
Last updated

Risk assessment

Low

Reviewed for sourcing quality and editorial consistency.

Sources

Related stories

View all

Topics

Get the weekly briefing

Weekly brief with top stories and market-moving news.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. By joining, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

About the author

Avantgarde News Desk covers protecting scientific integrity standards and editorial analysis for Avantgarde News.